<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portland&#8217;s MLS Offers More Views to Use</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.repdx.com/2007/09/13/portlands-mls-offers-more-views-to-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.repdx.com/2007/09/13/portlands-mls-offers-more-views-to-use/</link>
	<description>Portland Oregon Real Estate Resources</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Feed Bag - Found Some New Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2007/09/13/portlands-mls-offers-more-views-to-use/#comment-29283</link>
		<dc:creator>The Feed Bag - Found Some New Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 00:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2007/09/13/portlands-mls-offers-more-views-to-use/#comment-29283</guid>
		<description>[...] Ares linkbaits me with Portland&#8217;s MLS Offers More Views to Use&#160;at re:PDX. It&#8217;s a good question of what to do with the now 16 photo slots the Portland [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ares linkbaits me with Portland&rsquo;s MLS Offers More Views to Use&nbsp;at re:PDX. It&rsquo;s a good question of what to do with the now 16 photo slots the Portland [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athol Kay</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2007/09/13/portlands-mls-offers-more-views-to-use/#comment-29262</link>
		<dc:creator>Athol Kay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2007/09/13/portlands-mls-offers-more-views-to-use/#comment-29262</guid>
		<description>Hi there! Thanks for the link love I appreciate it.

&#62;&#62;I say it depends on the house. Some homes just won’t benefit from having additional images, due to size, disrepair, or owner’s unwillingness to clean up or de-clutter. For my money, the mandatory photos should capture the front of the home, the family and/or living room, the kitchen (from a couple angles), dining area, the master bedroom, plus the rear of the house and backyard. Beyond that, it would depend on other material or visual features of interest. 

I agree completely. I go 1-2-3-4 Front Ext, Kitchen, Dining Room, Living Room every time now. Then it's just hunting for features.

Seeing you have 16 (!) photos to use now, I might consider using all 16 photos with the less exciting shots of bathrooms and bedrooms. If only to say "it's not nasty and we have nothing to hide".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there! Thanks for the link love I appreciate it.</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;I say it depends on the house. Some homes just won’t benefit from having additional images, due to size, disrepair, or owner’s unwillingness to clean up or de-clutter. For my money, the mandatory photos should capture the front of the home, the family and/or living room, the kitchen (from a couple angles), dining area, the master bedroom, plus the rear of the house and backyard. Beyond that, it would depend on other material or visual features of interest. </p>
<p>I agree completely. I go 1-2-3-4 Front Ext, Kitchen, Dining Room, Living Room every time now. Then it&#8217;s just hunting for features.</p>
<p>Seeing you have 16 (!) photos to use now, I might consider using all 16 photos with the less exciting shots of bathrooms and bedrooms. If only to say &#8220;it&#8217;s not nasty and we have nothing to hide&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
