2008 Changes in Oregon Real Estate Practice
January 2nd, 2008
It’s a new year Baby, and with it come a handful of modifications to Oregon’s real estate practice.
The 2007 Legislature passed a few items that have impact on homebuyers and sellers, and Oregon’s largest multiple listing service, RMLS, has made some changes, too.
Here’s a summary*:
RMLS Listings Numbers Change: The listing identification number on properties for sale in the multiple listing service has changed. Starting January 1, all new MLS listing numbers start with an ‘8′, as in RMLS# 8000043. This is standard procedure for RMLS, however, it does not ensure that the listing is NEW in 2008. Listings can change brokers, be removed from the market temporarily and relisted, or are merely refreshed with a new number (a practice that is frowned upon). Check with your broker for details for a history of how long a listing has REALLY been active.
Contracts address Measure 49, sort of: The Oregon Real Estate Sale Agreement commonly used by Oregon Realtors, now contains language addressing the recent passage of Measure 49. Like the previous language for Oregon’s Measure 37, the language cautions buyers and sellers to know their rights and the rights of neighboring property owners under the provisions of the new law. Those rights might seem a little murky right now as the courts and counties grapple with land use applications and lawsuits.
Flippers Get Relief: Oregon House Bill 2498 provides an exception to the licensing requirements for general contractors. Previously, if you were in the business of buying properties and fixing them up for re-sale (flipping), you were required to have a contractor’s license. Now, you may work on up to three existing homes and market them for sale per calendar year. Please note that if remodeling requires building permits, the property owner is required to hire a general contractor to perform the work or supervise subcontractors.
Tax Withholding: This change may bite a few investors this year. Oregon House Bill 2592 created a provision for tax compliance withholding at closing for all non-resident owners. So, escrow companies will now be required to withhold a percentage of sales proceeds at closing from out-of-state or foreign owners that do not qualify for an exception.
The withholding amount is the lesser of: 1) 4% of the consideration; 2) 4% of the net proceeds; or 3) 10% of the gain includable in taxable income.
The exceptions include: 1) when the consideration is less than $100,000; 2) if the property is acquired through foreclosure; or 3) if the seller is advised by ‘professionally competent knowledge or advice’ that it is a non-taxable transaction (i.e. tax-deferred (1031) exchange, sale of a principal residence, etc.). Real estate investors, beware…and talk with your tax advisor!
Other changes: Other changes for 2008 on Oregon’s real estate forms include new warning language surrounding legal lot or parcel validation and some minor changes to property disclosure language, but I won’t belabor them here.
*Note: I am not a tax or legal advisor, but have written this to highlight some of the more significant changes to Oregon real estate practice.
(Disturbing) photo by LifeSciences used under Creative Commons license.
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!
Related posts:
- Portland Real Estate Market Results - August 2008 Final
- Portland Real Estate Market Activity - April 2008
- Early Returns - July 2008 Portland Real Estate Results
Entry Filed under: First-Time Buyers, Selling Advice











3 Comments Add your own
1. Jeff Bernheisel | January 3rd, 2008 at 10:32 am
Lots O’ changes!
Don’t forget about the new changes to advertising rules. Namely the amendment about typesize.
“Effective March 1, 2008, if the name of an associated broker is used in advertising, it may not be in larger type size than the name of the firm. The purpose of this amendment is to provide appropriate disclosure to the public.”
I think that’s going to cost a lot of people some money having to redesign their logos/biz cards/websites etc…
I have to laugh when the very first line in the purpose of the rule is: “Allows real estate licensees to advertise in a less costly manner”. Not too sure how that works…
-Jeff
2. Ron | January 3rd, 2008 at 11:08 am
Jeff -
Good catch, I had forgotten.
I wonder how it will be enforced…we’ve talked about whether there will be ‘font police’ checking x-heights and baselines (typography talk) on signs, business cards, websites, ads, and more.
You’re right, there are a lot of ‘teams’ out there that have minimized their broker’s branding and replaced it with their own mark.
3. Jeff Bernheisel | January 4th, 2008 at 10:58 am
Yeah, I guess we’ll find out…
I was trying to put together a big informational seminar with Phil Querin, but PMAR told him to hold off until they got some things straightened out in regards to that rule specifically. So, I wonder what they were “straightening out”?
Should be interesting to see…
Take care,
Jeff
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed