<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sneak Peek at March 2008 Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/</link>
	<description>Portland Oregon Real Estate Resources</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Ares</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44823</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Ares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44823</guid>
		<description>UG, 

Long time, no answer....sorry. I had to go to a pub and carve out some time to reply to comments... :)

There is no methodology change to how RMLS calculates pending sales...I just misunderstood it. They track sales that &lt;em&gt;go&lt;/em&gt; pending in the month. I was counting &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; pending sales. Some of them apparently have lonnnnng closing times.

The SoCal/PDX curve trajectory looks similar...but in 6 months I don't expect to see streets covered in FOR SALE signs and abandoned homes with squatters. Definitive recession and unemployment could change that, but that's a different dynamic altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UG, </p>
<p>Long time, no answer&#8230;.sorry. I had to go to a pub and carve out some time to reply to comments&#8230; <img src='http://www.repdx.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>There is no methodology change to how RMLS calculates pending sales&#8230;I just misunderstood it. They track sales that <em>go</em> pending in the month. I was counting <em>all</em> pending sales. Some of them apparently have lonnnnng closing times.</p>
<p>The SoCal/PDX curve trajectory looks similar&#8230;but in 6 months I don&#8217;t expect to see streets covered in FOR SALE signs and abandoned homes with squatters. Definitive recession and unemployment could change that, but that&#8217;s a different dynamic altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle_Git</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44736</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle_Git</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 16:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44736</guid>
		<description>Ron - I'd be curious what the new methodology entailed regarding the pending sales - surely something like that is pretty cut and dried ?

This is pretty much exactly what the state of play was in So Cal last spring - sellers listing at wishing prices and buyers staring going "Nuh uh - price falls coming"

I know you don't agree with my take on us following SoCal trends - but you gotta admit there are some startling similarities in the way the cycle has progressed in both markets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron - I&#8217;d be curious what the new methodology entailed regarding the pending sales - surely something like that is pretty cut and dried ?</p>
<p>This is pretty much exactly what the state of play was in So Cal last spring - sellers listing at wishing prices and buyers staring going &#8220;Nuh uh - price falls coming&#8221;</p>
<p>I know you don&#8217;t agree with my take on us following SoCal trends - but you gotta admit there are some startling similarities in the way the cycle has progressed in both markets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Ares</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44725</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Ares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 05:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44725</guid>
		<description>@Steve - I agree with your analysis. I suggested in an upcoming Oregonian interview (Thursday 4/10?) that sellers take their peak market price (as of July 2007) and subtract 5% if they need to sell quickly. 

I appreciate the compliment, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve - I agree with your analysis. I suggested in an upcoming Oregonian interview (Thursday 4/10?) that sellers take their peak market price (as of July 2007) and subtract 5% if they need to sell quickly. </p>
<p>I appreciate the compliment, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44724</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44724</guid>
		<description>The decreased sales coupled with stable prices suggest that sellers are holding out for last year's prices while buyers are trying to price in future drops.  That's means a thinning market until either buyers are willing to pay more--unlikely given the torrent of "bad housing market" news--or sellers lower their prices (the apparent modest trend).

Separately, three cheers to Ron for such an informative, intelligent, and frank site (compare with NAR cant) .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The decreased sales coupled with stable prices suggest that sellers are holding out for last year&#8217;s prices while buyers are trying to price in future drops.  That&#8217;s means a thinning market until either buyers are willing to pay more&#8211;unlikely given the torrent of &#8220;bad housing market&#8221; news&#8211;or sellers lower their prices (the apparent modest trend).</p>
<p>Separately, three cheers to Ron for such an informative, intelligent, and frank site (compare with NAR cant) .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Ares</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44723</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Ares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44723</guid>
		<description>@Laurel - I would prefer to see inventory clear and sellers get realistic about prices. We need to take our medicine for awhile. I wasn't comforted at the flat year-over-year result--it actually declined from February.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Laurel - I would prefer to see inventory clear and sellers get realistic about prices. We need to take our medicine for awhile. I wasn&#8217;t comforted at the flat year-over-year result&#8211;it actually declined from February.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Ares</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44722</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Ares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44722</guid>
		<description>@Rhonda - Who knew? The Little Professor was a gateway drug to the mortgage profession!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rhonda - Who knew? The Little Professor was a gateway drug to the mortgage profession!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44720</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44720</guid>
		<description>What is preferable, seeing sales drop way off and preserving the sale price, or selling more properties at a lower price? Maybe sales have stalled because sellers are not understanding that they will have to lower their prices to move property.

It's cold comfort that the average price is slightly up. All it means is that some high end places may have moved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is preferable, seeing sales drop way off and preserving the sale price, or selling more properties at a lower price? Maybe sales have stalled because sellers are not understanding that they will have to lower their prices to move property.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s cold comfort that the average price is slightly up. All it means is that some high end places may have moved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda Porter</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44718</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/09/sneak-peek-at-march-2008-results/#comment-44718</guid>
		<description>OMG what a flash back...I had a "Little Professor" calculator and loved it...perhaps that was the tool that caused me to enter the mortgage profession.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG what a flash back&#8230;I had a &#8220;Little Professor&#8221; calculator and loved it&#8230;perhaps that was the tool that caused me to enter the mortgage profession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
