<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portland Real Estate Activity - March 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/17/portland-real-estate-activity-march-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/17/portland-real-estate-activity-march-2008/</link>
	<description>Portland Oregon Real Estate Resources</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron Ares</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/17/portland-real-estate-activity-march-2008/#comment-44822</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Ares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/17/portland-real-estate-activity-march-2008/#comment-44822</guid>
		<description>The Case-Shiller might be useful for comparing the 20 major metros it covers, but there is no index for micro-market segments like Hillsboro, NE Portland, or Gresham, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Case-Shiller might be useful for comparing the 20 major metros it covers, but there is no index for micro-market segments like Hillsboro, NE Portland, or Gresham, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle_Git</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/17/portland-real-estate-activity-march-2008/#comment-44821</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle_Git</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/17/portland-real-estate-activity-march-2008/#comment-44821</guid>
		<description>Ron - the Case/Schiller index is probably about the most accurate IMHO - although it lags by a month or two.

Certainly the appreciation numbers are more or less worthless in a market that's changing as quickly as this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron - the Case/Schiller index is probably about the most accurate IMHO - although it lags by a month or two.</p>
<p>Certainly the appreciation numbers are more or less worthless in a market that&#8217;s changing as quickly as this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/17/portland-real-estate-activity-march-2008/#comment-44820</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/17/portland-real-estate-activity-march-2008/#comment-44820</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ron.  Your blog is very helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ron.  Your blog is very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Ares</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/17/portland-real-estate-activity-march-2008/#comment-44818</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Ares</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/17/portland-real-estate-activity-march-2008/#comment-44818</guid>
		<description>Appreciation percentages are based on a comparison of average price from the last 12 months (04/01/07 - 03/31/08) with 12 months before (04/01/06 - 03/31/07). While I think it may be a useful method for looking at long-term appreciation, it tends to mask the most recent months' activity. Prices have flattened out.

Many real estate practitioners are looking at month-over-month and year-over-year comparisons now. So, the March 2008 average sale price of $336,700 is roughly flat from the March 2007's result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciation percentages are based on a comparison of average price from the last 12 months (04/01/07 - 03/31/08) with 12 months before (04/01/06 - 03/31/07). While I think it may be a useful method for looking at long-term appreciation, it tends to mask the most recent months&#8217; activity. Prices have flattened out.</p>
<p>Many real estate practitioners are looking at month-over-month and year-over-year comparisons now. So, the March 2008 average sale price of $336,700 is roughly flat from the March 2007&#8217;s result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/17/portland-real-estate-activity-march-2008/#comment-44817</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.repdx.com/2008/04/17/portland-real-estate-activity-march-2008/#comment-44817</guid>
		<description>How come all the 12 month appreciation numbers are positive bu multiple percentage points except Milwaukie / Clackamas yet Portland's average sales price is basically flat to last year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come all the 12 month appreciation numbers are positive bu multiple percentage points except Milwaukie / Clackamas yet Portland&#8217;s average sales price is basically flat to last year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
