Why Is Anyone In This Picture Smiling?

October 3rd, 2008

Celebrating the $700B Bailout

I don’t think it’s an appropriate pose. Period.

Hat tip: Tom Royce @ The Real Estate Bloggers.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • LinkedIn

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

No related posts.

Entry Filed under: National News

9 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Matt Harris  |  October 3rd, 2008 at 9:56 pm

    Is this when Ashton Kutcher pops up and tells the world “you’ve been punk’d”?

  • 2. Mike  |  October 3rd, 2008 at 10:53 pm

    Smiling because they held out long enough to get pork for their districts to help their re-election efforts.

  • 3. Matt Harris  |  October 3rd, 2008 at 11:54 pm

    Can you say “line items”? Whaaat?

  • 4. Ben Galvin  |  October 4th, 2008 at 6:29 am

    What do you feel would have been better?

  • 5. bearlee  |  October 4th, 2008 at 6:43 am

    Were there any concessions like:

    1) Caps on executive pay? Any hear about the WaMu’s Platinum Gold parachutes?!?!

    2) Tighter regulations and actual enforcement? What’s going to prevent this god awful greed from killing our economy again?

    3) Anyone worried about a bank monopoly with all the buy ups?

    4) They predicted a great depression if this doesn’t pass but they make no prediction of what good will come off this $800 billion? Could this $800 billion be spent another way to rev up the economy? California now wants $7 billion and I am gonna guess that NYC will be having their hands out, too.

    4) Any assistance for those home buyers that were victims to the old bait and switch and other crimes of the mortgage industry? Good to see some crooks get prosecuted, even here in the Portland area. And no bail out for the speculators, of course. They had to see this coming.

    Do we really know what is going on here?!?!?!

  • 6. Ron Ares  |  October 4th, 2008 at 12:44 pm

    Ben,

    I’m not suggesting that they shouldn’t have acted…I just don’t see what there is to be happy about.

    Something more like Rahm Emanuel’s countenance in the foreground: grim, thoughtful, resolved. But not mugging for the paparazzi, please.

  • 7. Corri Klebaum  |  October 5th, 2008 at 7:16 am

    I will be nice here Ron as this is your blog but poo floats.

  • 8. Jeff Johnson  |  October 5th, 2008 at 10:56 am

    Hey Look ! There’s Forrest Gump in the background … (joke)

  • 9. uncle_git  |  October 6th, 2008 at 5:58 pm

    Because they just pulled off the biggest theft in history on behalf their corporate sponsors….

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Calendar

October 2008
M T W T F S S
« Sep   Nov »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Recent Posts

Twitter Feed

  • My apheresis appointment @ the Red Crosst this afternoon is 2 hours long - I can watch a movie while I bleed. Any suggestions? 5 hrs ago
  • Don't editors look at headlines anymore? Second typo I've seen this morning- "recinds" instead of rescinds 6 hrs ago
  • Listening to @jburslem with Inman News giving a marketing webinar, rough start with technical issues, sounds like it's coming together now 1 day ago
  • At Starbucks, listening to a sales pitch at the next table. The word "me" is getting used a lot. Not a lot of "you". 2 days ago
  • Note to Katie Couric's makeup artist -- your eyeliner treatment makes her look like a racoon, just sayin' 2 days ago
  • More updates...

Current Mortgage Rates See local rates Zillow Mortgage Marketplace Get this widget